Supplemental Draft EIS Comments

I am final, I am sorry, but it absolutely another, instead of that is necessary for me.


------
https://the.hosting/uk/help/rest-api-sozdaem-udobnyj-veb-servis

this will be a BIG disaster in the making, this company has the worst safety record of any other pipeline company, their leak into the Kalamazoo river, still is NOT back to normal, this pipeline is just basically a short cut to Windsor Ont. we as a country are trying to faze out fossil fuels, so why are we in a hurry, to back having more pollution, how can we as a state or country trust this company to follow all the in place cautions (rules) when they don't now, they just thumb their collective noses at the rules that are already in place, how many years will it take to build the pipeline, by that time we probably won't need it, plus all the bottom of the lakes will be disturbed, all that silt will go to who knows where, how many millions gallons of oil were leaked in WI, before they even knew there was a leak, we drink the water from the great lakes, where is anyone going to get that replaced, when its contaminated with oil, how are the fish that won't be edible or even survive, be replaced, why are we paying to have a foreign company boost their profit margin at the expense of our own companies, how much is that oil going to benefit us, look at other pipelines that go to Texas, only not to be used by us, but is exported. the line that is now in use, has had leaks and has been damaged, their upkeep isn't keeping up either, are your kids or their kids be happy when it leaks and all the lakes usefulness won't be useful, not only all of that, with the now in place President, wants us to be self sufficient and not import oil and do more drilling in our country, so how does that fit in with those wishes? the minuses far outweigh the pluses think along the lines of what is best for our citizens, not BIG businesses

The location of the line 5 project poses a great threat to the largest freshwater resources in North America, the Great Lakes. If Enbridge wishes to install or resume a pipeline, please do so elsewhere with less potentially catastrophic risks to the health and safety of the people and wildlife of the Great Lakes region, and place it outside of the Great Lakes Basin/watershed. Oil spills are devastating, and we cannot afford the potential catastrophe here, for an oil pipeline. Perhaps run it much farther west, from Canada through the Dakotas or Montana, and pump it back east, if need be. Thank you.

The location of the line 5 project poses a great threat to the largest freshwater resources in North America, the Great Lakes. If Enbridge wishes to install or resume a pipeline, please do so elsewhere with less potentially catastrophic risks to the health and safety of the people and wildlife of the Great Lakes region, and place it outside of the Great Lakes Basin/watershed. Oil spills are devastating, and we cannot afford the potential catastrophe here, for an oil pipeline. Perhaps run it much farther west, from Canada through the Dakotas or Montana, and pump it back east, if need be. Thank you.

The location of the line 5 project poses a great threat to the largest freshwater resources in North America, the Great Lakes. If Enbridge wishes to install or resume a pipeline, please do so elsewhere with less potentially catastrophic risks to the health and safety of the people and wildlife of the Great Lakes region, and place it outside of the Great Lakes Basin/watershed. Oil spills are devastating, and we cannot afford the potential catastrophe here, for an oil pipeline. Perhaps run it much farther west, from Canada through the Dakotas or Montana, and pump it back east, if need be. Thank you.

The location of the line 5 project poses a great threat to the largest freshwater resources in North America, the Great Lakes. If Enbridge wishes to install or resume a pipeline, please do so elsewhere with less potentially catastrophic risks to the health and safety of the people and wildlife of the Great Lakes region, and place it outside of the Great Lakes Basin/watershed. Oil spills are devastating, and we cannot afford the potential catastrophe here, for an oil pipeline. Perhaps run it much farther west, from Canada through the Dakotas or Montana, and pump it back east, if need be. Thank you.

It is remarkable, rather amusing idea


------
https://the.hosting/cs/ssd-dedicated-server

I oppose the project.

We live on the north shore of Lake Michigan about 10 miles west of the Enbridge pipeline.
We support the tunnel project and the sooner it is built, the safer we'll be.

DONT DO THIS - WHY ARE WE EVEN CONSIDERING ANYTHING NEAR THE GREAT LAKES REGION - DO YOU NOT HAVE GRANDCHILDREN?