Name
Tim Cook
Organization/Affiliation
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 12:29 pm
Attachment
Comments
I support line 5. Energy is vital for the USA from home use to national defense.
Name
Kent Vander Loon
Organization/Affiliation
Christian Home Services Inc
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 11:23 am
Attachment
Comments
Please approve this project as it will not only protect the great lakes but also give Michigan its needed fuel to keep our homes heated and industry working. Using 8 acres of land is not a problem.
Name
James Grundstrom
Organization/Affiliation
Dead River Campers, Inc
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 10:36 am
Attachment
Comments
Name
Barbi Schroeder
Organization/Affiliation
Mackinac County Planning Comm
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 10:16 am
Attachment
Comments
I have complete faith that this Line 5 is safe and functional. We need it here. Thank you all for doing a commendable service to our state.
I have zero complaints.
I have zero complaints.
Name
Lucas Vick
Organization/Affiliation
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 9:40 am
Attachment
Comments
I support the Line 5 Tunnel Project. It is a good, safe plan. The plan will benefit the people of Michigan and the US. We will have a more secure oil supply and hopefully less expensive fuel which will boost the entirety of our economy. This progress has been stalled long enough.
Thank you kindly.
Thank you kindly.
Name
Mary Myers
Organization/Affiliation
Lake Superior Community Partnership
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 8:51 am
Attachment
Comments
Name
Lauren Teichner
Organization/Affiliation
Teichner Law PLC
Entry Date
June 18, 2025 8:27 am
Attachment
Comments
I strongly urge the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to reject the proposed Line 5 tunnel project. This project has not undergone a comprehensive risk assessment, despite posing grave risks to the Great Lakes, our climate, and public safety. The tunnel would not eliminate the spill threat from the aging pipeline, and an oil spill in this region would be catastrophic - threatening drinking water for 40 million people, harming wildlife, and jeopardizing Michigan’s economy, which depends on the Great Lakes for over 1.3 million jobs and $82 billion in wages. Tunnel and safety experts have raised serious concerns about the logistics and worker risks of boring beneath the lakebed, calling the project technically challenging and dangerous. The DEIS acknowledges ecological damage - including wetland loss, endangered species impacts, noise, and contamination - yet fails to fully evaluate greenhouse gas emissions or health impacts, locking us into decades more of fossil fuel use at a time of worsening climate and public health crises. The so-called “energy emergency” used to justify the rushed review is politically motivated and should not override public input or environmental protections. At least seven Tribal Nations have suspended consultation due to failure to uphold treaty rights or consider alternatives like pipeline decommissioning. Approving this project before those concerns and legal processes are resolved would be premature, unjustified, and harmful to future generations.
Name
Mary Haws
Organization/Affiliation
Entry Date
June 17, 2025 7:34 pm
Attachment
Comments
When are we finally going to learn that Mother Nature matters more than greed? Our fresh water and the wildlife and people that count on it SHOULD have more value in the decision making than the fossil fuel industry. A complete environmental review is needed. Our water is special, please do the right thing and not put it at risk. We do not need Line 5!
Thank you
Thank you
Name
Lorraine Coburn
Organization/Affiliation
Groundwork
Entry Date
June 17, 2025 5:58 pm
Attachment
Comments
The Trump administration is pushing for Line 5 to go through. This is irresponsible and a danger to the world's largest fresh water supply, as well as the billions of dollars in business that rely on the Great Lakes. Further, very little of this oil is for the United States. Enbridge, a Canadian company that is responsible for the largest internal oil spill in U.S. history in the Kalamazoo River, wants to use the Great Lakes for a shortcut.
Tunnel Engineer Brian O'Mara points out that the conditions under the Straits of Mackinac are not fit for a tunnel.
In regard to Enbridge's initial engineering report that supported the oil tunnel, O’Mara called out the following, “They (Enbridge) assumed very good rock conditions, they assumed minimal groundwater inflow, they assumed no toxic gases or methane. Most importantly they assumed that the tunnel annulus, which is the space between the pipeline and tunnel wall, be completely filled or backfilled with concrete … none of those conditions came true.”
In regard to Enbridge’s lack of adequate sampling of the bedrock, O’Mara remarked, “They didn’t do nearly enough borings, they didn’t go nearly deep enough, and they didn’t take the samples where they should have. And despite all of those deficiencies in their study they came back—and the report is open to the public—the rock quality is extremely poor to very poor quality. They grade rocks from 0-100%. 25% of the rock was a zero …This is the worst rock I’ve ever seen anyone think about putting a tunnel in… because the rock is so bad it doesn’t behave like rock, it behaves more like gravel.”
The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible to the public and to clean, safe waterways, not to the Trump administration and corporate interests. Please do the right thing and vote your conscience. An oil spill, if this goes through, will weigh on your conscience.
Tunnel Engineer Brian O'Mara points out that the conditions under the Straits of Mackinac are not fit for a tunnel.
In regard to Enbridge's initial engineering report that supported the oil tunnel, O’Mara called out the following, “They (Enbridge) assumed very good rock conditions, they assumed minimal groundwater inflow, they assumed no toxic gases or methane. Most importantly they assumed that the tunnel annulus, which is the space between the pipeline and tunnel wall, be completely filled or backfilled with concrete … none of those conditions came true.”
In regard to Enbridge’s lack of adequate sampling of the bedrock, O’Mara remarked, “They didn’t do nearly enough borings, they didn’t go nearly deep enough, and they didn’t take the samples where they should have. And despite all of those deficiencies in their study they came back—and the report is open to the public—the rock quality is extremely poor to very poor quality. They grade rocks from 0-100%. 25% of the rock was a zero …This is the worst rock I’ve ever seen anyone think about putting a tunnel in… because the rock is so bad it doesn’t behave like rock, it behaves more like gravel.”
The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible to the public and to clean, safe waterways, not to the Trump administration and corporate interests. Please do the right thing and vote your conscience. An oil spill, if this goes through, will weigh on your conscience.
Name
Douglas Stockwell
Organization/Affiliation
Operating Engineers 324
Entry Date
June 17, 2025 4:12 pm
Comments